Christian Saints & Early Church Fathers Codexery

Peter the Hermit

Priest who led the People's Crusade and was linked to early massacres.

Peter the Hermit—also called Little Peter, Peter of Amiens, or Peter of Achères—was a Roman Catholic priest from Amiens who played a key role in the 1096 People’s Crusade, the military expedition from France to Jerusalem. Jewish tradition associates him with the Rhineland massacres, which set a precedent for later Crusades, though he has never been officially beatified by the Catholic Church, despite being sometimes referred to as “Blessed.”

His French name, Pierre l’Ermite, has led some Francophone scholars to treat “l’Ermite” as a surname rather than a title. Some sources claim he was born around 1050, the son of Renauld L’Ermite of Auvergne and Alide Montaigu of Picardie; others say he belonged to the L’Hermite family of Auvergne in the Netherlands. These claims are disputed, as no evidence confirms “the Hermit” was a real surname, and surnames did not develop until after his time.

Before 1096, according to Anna Komnene’s *Alexiad*, Peter attempted a pilgrimage to Jerusalem but was blocked by Seljuk Turks and mistreated. He reportedly witnessed disturbing scenes at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre—gentiles polluting holy places, stealing offerings, beating Christians, and extorting pilgrims. When he asked the patriarch why this was allowed, the patriarch replied that he had only the strength of a tiny ant compared to the oppressors and had to pay regular tribute (jizya) to avoid death. This experience led Peter to preach inflammatory statements about the Turks, though doubts remain whether he ever made such a journey.

It is uncertain if Peter attended Pope Urban II’s Council of Clermont in 1095, where the Pope announced his military strategy for the First Crusade. What is certain is that Peter became a preacher of the armed pilgrimage in France afterward, and his own experiences may have fueled the cause. Tradition in Huy holds that he was present when war was declared and began preaching immediately. He gained fame as an emotional revivalist, and most historians agree that thousands of serfs and peasants eagerly took the cross at his bidding, partly due to promises he made. This became known as the Crusade of the Paupers. Peter organized them as a spiritually purified, holy group supposedly protected by the Holy Ghost, but he did not train them, supply weapons, or provide food. Some historians think the People’s Crusade may have also included well-armed soldiers and nobles.

Pope Urban II commissioned Peter to command an armed pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Before departing, Peter received permission from Patriarch Simeon II of Jerusalem. He recruited from England, Lorraine, France, and Flanders, arriving in Cologne, Germany, on Holy Saturday, 12 April 1096.

In spring 1096, Peter was one of the prominent figures involved in the Rhineland massacres against Jews. His troops participated in the torture and slaughter of Jews in Lorraine, Cologne, Worms, Speyer, and Mainz. In Mainz, his followers killed a large group of Jews who had been granted refuge by a local bishop in exchange for money. Death toll estimates generally range from 2,000 to 2,800 civilians, though some claim about 5,000 or even 10,000. These killings are known as *Gzerot Tatnó* (Edicts of 4856). Another group, led by the knight count Emicho of Leiningen, provoked the massacres.

Before reaching Constantinople, Peter and his followers faced difficulties. In Zemun, the governor—a descendant of a Ghuzz Turk—and a colleague, frightened by the army’s size, tightened frontier regulations. A dispute over a pair of shoes sparked a riot, and against Peter’s wishes, the town was attacked and the citadel stormed. This resulted in 4,000 Hungarians killed and many provisions stolen. On 26 June 1096, Peter’s army crossed the Sava River, marched into Belgrade, set it on fire, and pillaged it. They then moved through Nish after an eight-day delay. Riding toward Sofia, they were attacked by Byzantine soldiers on the road, losing a quarter of their army. Peter’s forces were almost entirely annihilated by the Seljuk Turks, forcing him to winter in Constantinople and join the Prince’s Crusade. He continued to hold a leadership role, with varying significance, as the Crusaders invaded the Levant and captured Jerusalem.

Lore & Background

Others claim he was a member of the L'Hermite family of Auvergne in France. These claims are disputed by still other authors, who argue that no evidence can confirm that 'the Hermit' was an actual surname, and that surnames did not develop until after his time. He was said to have witnessed disturbing scenes, and after reaching the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, he saw 'many forbidden and wicked things' and questioned the patriarch, who expressed helplessness against the Turks. This experience caused Peter to preach inflammatory statements about the Turks, though doubts remain whether he ever made such a journey. It is certain that he was one of the preachers of the armed pilgrimage in France afterwards. He soon leapt into fame as an emotional revivalist, and the vast majority of sources and historians agree that thousands of serfs and peasants eagerly took the cross at his bidding. Peter organized and guided the paupers as a spiritually purified and holy group of pilgrims. He did not train his army, nor did he supply weapons or food. Before reaching Constantinople, Peter and his followers experienced difficulty. The army then marched into Belgrade, set the town on fire, and pillaged it. After an eight-day delay in Nish, they were attacked by Byzantine soldiers and lost a quarter of their army. Byzantine emperor Alexios I Komnenos was displeased. After being shipped across the Bosporus, the paupers entered Turkish territory despite warnings. In Peter's absence, the pilgrims

Reader's Guide

Peter the Hermit's significance lies in his role as a catalyst for the People's Crusade, a popular movement that preceded the main armed crusade and demonstrated the power of religious fervor among common people. His preaching, based on his reported pilgrimage and the patriarch's complaints, mobilized thousands of serfs and peasants, though his lack of military organization led to disaster. These killings, known as Gzerot Tatnó, set a precedent for violence against Jews in later Crusades. The People's Crusade itself was almost entirely annihilated by the Seljuk Turks, forcing Peter to winter in Constantinople and join the Prince's Crusade, where he continued to have a leadership role in varying degrees of significance as the Crusaders invaded the Levant and took Jerusalem. His legacy is thus twofold: as a symbol of popular crusading zeal and as a figure associated with early anti-Jewish violence.

Did You Know?

Origins and Editorial Ambition

The series was designed from the outset to replace the nineteenth-century Ante-Nicene Fathers and Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers collections, which Schopp and his colleagues regarded as outdated. By the mid-twentieth century, critical editions of patristic texts had become available, and scholars possessed a deeper command of the Greek and Latin in which these early Christian writers composed. The FOTC project harnessed both of these advances, committing itself to rendering the source material into what its editors called contemporary English. Every volume was also expected to carry a full scholarly apparatus: an introductory essay, detailed footnotes, a bibliography, and an index of Scripture references, giving readers tools for serious study rather than mere devotional reading.

Editorial Rationale and Shifting Priorities

Roy J. He identified what he called an anti-Catholic bias in the older Ante-Nicene and Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers editions, a bias he found nothing short of shocking to anyone who used those volumes, and he expressed a clear desire to supplant them entirely. In its earliest phase, the FOTC series concentrated on producing fresh translations of texts that already had English versions, updating language and scholarship. Over time, however, the editorial focus shifted. Rather than merely retranslating familiar works, the series began to prioritize publishing patristic texts that had never before appeared in English, broadening the accessible corpus for Anglophone readers. This pivot meant that volumes could introduce lesser-known authors and previously untranslated treatises alongside the more famous figures, expanding the series' reach well beyond the canonical highlights of early Christian literature.

Publication History and Institutional Home

The FOTC series did not begin under a university imprint. In its earliest years, the volumes were privately published by two entities: Christian Heritage, Inc., and Fathers of the Church, Inc. The move to a university press gave the project a more stable institutional anchor and a broader distribution network. The series has remained ongoing throughout its history, continuing to add new volumes. Peter Damian, the opening of a planned six-volume set. This new line marked a deliberate expansion of the project's chronological scope, extending the translation effort beyond the first centuries of Christianity and into the medieval period, thereby acknowledging that the patristic tradition did not simply end with the early church fathers.

Range of Authors and Works

The volumes listed in the series span an impressive breadth of patristic literature. St. Augustine dominates the catalogue, with multiple dedicated volumes covering his Confessions, the City of God in two parts, his extensive correspondence in three letter volumes, ascetical treatises, sermons on the Lord's Sermon on the Mount, and collections of shorter works on topics ranging from lying to fasting to widowhood. Beyond Augustine, the series includes the apologetical writings of Tertullian and Justin Martyr, the ascetical works and letters of St. Basil, the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius of Caesarea, the sermons of Peter Chrysologus and Valerian, and a volume of early Christian biographies gathering the lives of Cyprian, Ambrose, Anthony, Paul the First Hermit, Hilarion, and others. Each volume typically lists one or more translators, and some entries include additional scholarly notes by editors like Deferrari. The range from major theological treatises to brief homilies and hagiographical sketches illustrates the series' commitment to making the full spectrum of early Christian writing available in modern English.

Gallery

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Peter the Hermit recognized as a saint by the Catholic Church?

No, he has never been beatified or canonized and holds no official sainthood or beatification status in the Catholic Church. Despite his prominent place in medieval religious history, the Church has not granted him any formal recognition as a blessed or saint.

More in Christian Saints & Early Church Fathers 1-24

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →